Description
The Karnak pendulum draws on ancient Egyptian symbolism and the radiesthesia tradition. Its cylindrical, segmented shape is characteristic of Karnak-type pendulums, and the hollow cavity inside holds a sample of a chosen object, person, or location — called a "vector" in radiesthesia methodology — as the reference point for a specific radiesthesia inquiry.
This pendulum uses the Biomind Initiation program, following the Biomind radionics methodology. It is part of the radionics / energy-information model.
In the radiesthesia tradition, the Karnak pendulum works with the so-called "Negative Green" radiesthesia colour, and in some methodologies also with the "white" radiesthesia colour — energy categories used within the radiesthesia model.
In radiesthesia practice, the Karnak pendulum is used to work directly with maps, samples, objects, locations, and energetic and symbolic themes. Results obtained are interpretations of the radiesthesia method, not objective laboratory analysis or medical diagnostics.
According to some radiesthesia practice methodologies, pendulums assigned to the "Negative Green" category are disassembled after use or subjected to other energy-cleansing methods used in this practice.
Important information
This pendulum is an instrument of radiesthesia and energy practices. It is not a medical device and is not intended for the diagnosis, treatment, cure, or prevention of diseases or other health conditions.
Terms such as “Negative Green” and “vector” describe the energetic and informational themes the Karnak pendulum is used to explore, not a claim of biochemical action on the body's physical tissue.
Interpretations obtained during radiesthesia practice are not intended to determine a person’s health condition, illnesses, or physiological parameters. Decisions related to health, medication, or treatment should not be made based on the results of using this pendulum.
The field of radionics and the informational field has been the subject of scientific research for over a century. In recent years the number of publications has been growing (e.g. Rubik B. et al., “Biofield Science and Healing: History, Terminology, and Concepts”, Global Advances in Health and Medicine, 2015), but existing studies are not yet sufficient for definitive clinical conclusions.